The equator principles
There are two different ways to calculate the average DSCR that could result in different numerical outcomes. What are the methods? What are the limitations that we should be aware of? And which one shall be used?
DSCR (Debt Service Coverage Ratio) is one of the most commonly used debt metrics in Project Finance. Aside from the profile of the DSCR calculated on every calculation period, the average DSCR is an important output in a project finance model.
On the face of it there is not much difference but this tutorial will demonstrate that they can result in very different numerical outcomes. We will further discuss why they are different and which method is to be used particularly when we are dealing with exotic cashflows or repayments.
This may be the most common way people used when calculating the average DSCR.
Let’s recap this calculation method:
Average DSCR = {AVERAGE ( IF ( RANGE < > 0, RANGE ) ) }The average DSCR is calculated using the simple steps below:
Average DSCR = Total CFADS (life of loan) / Total P+I (life of loan)
Let’s take a look at an example in Screenshot 1 where the CFADS is pretty much on a straight line profile and the debt is repaid on annuity basis. The life of the loan is from Jan-10 to Mar-14. Period by period DSCRs are then calculated during the life of the loan and plotted as shown in Screenshot 2.
Screenshot 1: CFADS vs. Annuity debt service (example 1)
Screenshot 2: DSCR plot (example 1)
How to calculate the DSCR using the two methods? Do you think there will be difference? Refer to Screenshot 3.
Screenshot 3: Average DSCR (example 1)
You can see that the sum of CFADS over the life of loan is $86.6 million and the sum of P+I is $46.4 million, therefore the average DSCR calculated using Method 2 is 1.867x. If we calculate the average using Method 1 then the result is 1.867x too!
Now, let us take a look at different repayment profile. Refer to Screenshot 4 – the final repayment being very small compared to the other earlier periods. Period by period DSCRs are plotted in Screenshot 5.
Screenshot 4: CFADS vs. Debt service (example 2)
Screenshot 5: DSCR plot (example 2)
Similar to the first example, let us calculate the average DSCR using the two methods and see how different the outcome in Screenshot 6. The average DSCR calculated using Method 1 (2.027x) which is much higher compared to that calculated in Method 2 ($86.6 mil / $45.9 mil = 1.886x)
Screenshot 6: Average DSCR (example 2)
There is a concept difference behind the two calculation methods:
The difference is not obvious when the cashflow / debt service is flat such demonstrated in the first example.
This is however best highlighted when there are extreme values such as the final repayment being very small as shown in the later example. The DSCR in the last period is enormously high (refer to Screenshot 5) which is given equal importance in Method 1 and distorting the overall average
There is nothing wrong with both methods. The important thing is to understand what they actually mean and be aware of the limitations.
In certain situations be aware that Method 2 is probably more meaningful and would be the more accurate representation of the average.
See All Resources Get the latest Project Finance Tutorials and Blog Posts...
You will go into the draw to WIN a FREE training course.
Instantly unsubscribe at any time. We value your privacy.
We provide leading project finance professionals with in-house training and four public courses in Asia, Europe, US and the Middle East.
The Navigator model gives us the capacity to evaluate the cashflow impact of a new opportunity very quickly, and assists in rapid turnaround from potential financiers. If and when we take on debt, it will also enable us to model and anticipate changes in our cashflow outlook, and help us to be pro-active in managing our banking relationships. Feedback from our banks was extremely positive when they were presented with the model - it is in a familiar format, and key assumptions are easily adjusted to facilitate credit evaluation.Petsec Energy